This guide was built to help you understand the benefits of incorporating your DAO and how the process of DAO incorporation works. We help you answer questions like:
Why should I incorporate my DAO? In what geographic jurisdiction should I incorporate my DAO? What legal entity type should I choose?
Get all the information you need to make the best decisions for you DAO by reading this guide.
By
Leo Henkels
Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) have emerged as a revolutionary concept in the world of blockchain and cryptocurrency, promising a new paradigm of collective decision-making and resource allocation. However, as these digital entities evolve, they face unique challenges that test the limits of their governance models and operational structures. One such case that captured the crypto community's attention is CityDAO. This pioneering project aimed to bring the concept of decentralized governance to real estate acquisition and management.
CityDAO burst onto the scene with an ambitious vision: to purchase and collectively manage land using blockchain technology. As “Just DAO It” podcast host Adam Miller explains:
"CityDAO has been around for at least a couple of years and got some media coverage when they incorporated in Wyoming, one of the early DAO LLCs. I believe they bought land in Wyoming; at least they always talked about buying land."
This initiative was groundbreaking in several ways. First, it was one of the earliest attempts to bridge the gap between digital governance and physical assets. Second, it leveraged Wyoming's progressive crypto laws, which allowed for the creation of DAO LLCs, providing a legal framework for decentralized organizations.
The project garnered significant attention and support, with many seeing it as a potential model for how DAOs could operate in the real world. However, recent developments have cast a shadow over CityDAO's future, raising essential questions about the lifecycle management of DAOs.
In a recent tweet, CityDAO announced a critical juncture in its existence:
"Citizens, it's time for an important vote. Should CityDAO return our remaining funds to citizens? Vote here on the snapshot."
This announcement signals a potential end to the CityDAO experiment, highlighting the challenges that DAOs face as they mature. As Miller points out:
"They're running into something that I think a lot of organizations run into at some point over their lifecycle, which is that they're thinking about shutting down, and in shutting down, returning whatever funds they have in the treasury."
The situation with CityDAO brings to light several crucial issues that all DAOs must grapple with:
1. Lifecycle Planning
2. Member Rights and Exit Strategies
3. Asset Management
4. Legal and Regulatory Compliance
Let's delve into these aspects to understand the broader implications for the DAO ecosystem.
One of the most significant lessons from the CityDAO situation is the importance of comprehensive lifecycle planning. As Graham Novak, CEO and founder of Mezzanine Labs, observes:
"There are a lot of DAOs and organizations that launch very rapidly, especially during the bull market, and not all of them have what I just described as lifecycle plans. What happens in the event that we lose steam, run out of funding, or don't have enough interest, or whatever our mission is no longer feasible?"
This lack of foresight is a common pitfall for many DAOs. In the excitement of launching a new project and the rush to capitalize on market enthusiasm, founders often need to plan for potential failure scenarios or exit strategies. This oversight can lead to significant challenges down the line, as we're seeing with CityDAO.
A robust lifecycle plan should address various scenarios, including:
1. Milestones for success and growth
2. Triggers for reassessment or potential shutdown
3. Procedures for returning funds to members
4. Plans for managing and liquidating assets
5. Mechanisms for evolving the organization's mission, if needed
By incorporating these elements into the initial DAO structure, organizations can ensure they have the flexibility to adapt to changing circumstances and the ability to wind down operations in an orderly manner if necessary.
Another critical issue highlighted by the CityDAO situation is member rights, particularly when it comes to exiting the organization. This brings us to the concept of "rage quit," a feature implemented by some DAOs to allow members to leave and reclaim their share of the treasury if they disagree with the organization's direction.
Miller recounts an interesting anecdote about CityDAO's early days:
"I met someone who actually 'rage quit' from City earlier on in their development. And when I say 'rage quit,' it's not because they had built a rage quit functionality into their DAO smart contracts, which is something some DAOs do, but the founder said, 'Okay, you know what? If you want out, it's okay. I'll give you your share of or whatever you had purchased your NFT for, and you can get out.'"
However, this informal rage quit option was not maintained throughout CityDAO's lifecycle:
"But now, from what I hear, there has been no rage quitting allowed, and so that's part of the interesting discussion now."
This situation raises important questions about member rights in DAOs:
1. Should members always have the right to exit with their share of the treasury?
2. How does allowing (or not allowing) accessible exits affect a DAO's stability and long-term viability?
3. What are the implications of changing exit policies over time?
Novak offers some insights on the rage quit mechanism:
"I think it is a good mechanism for some organizations. It's not going to be right for everybody. For those who aren't familiar, Rage Quit basically allows a member or participant in an organization to take their portion of the treasury and say, 'Hey, I'm going to leave. The group's going to make a decision that I don't really like, so I'm going to take my fair portion of it and leave, and choose to not participate anymore."
However, he also points out potential drawbacks:
"Now, this is problematic for some organizations. If it really is 'you need everything or nothing,' like if you only have half the assets and half the people leave, what you're doing might no longer be feasible. And also, it doesn't align incentives or allow an organization to have really long-term commitment to things as well."
The rage quit dilemma illustrates the delicate balance DAOs must strike between providing flexibility for members and maintaining organizational stability. It also highlights the need for clear, well-thought-out policies regarding member rights and exit strategies from the outset.
CityDAO's focus on real estate acquisition adds an extra layer of complexity to its potential shutdown. As Miller notes:
"I'm not sure what would happen with the real estate but returning the funds they have in the treasury to citizens."
This situation highlights a unique challenge for DAOs that deal with physical assets: How do you manage and potentially liquidate these assets in a decentralized manner? Traditional organizations have established processes for handling such situations, but DAOs are treading new ground.
Some questions that arise include:
1. How can a DAO ensure fair valuation and sale of physical assets?
2. What happens if the real estate market is unfavorable at the time of liquidation?
3. How do you handle partial liquidations if some members want to continue the project?
4. What are the tax implications of distributing proceeds from real estate sales to DAO members?
These questions underscore the need for DAOs to have clear protocols in place for managing physical assets throughout their lifecycle, including potential shutdown scenarios.
CityDAO's incorporation as a DAO LLC in Wyoming was a pioneering move, leveraging new legal structures designed to accommodate decentralized organizations. However, as the organization faces a potential shutdown, it also serves as a test case for how these new legal entities handle dissolution.
Some key considerations include:
1. How does the DAO LLC structure affect returning funds to members?
2. Are there specific legal requirements for dissolving a DAO LLC that differ from traditional LLCs?
3. How does the decentralized nature of decision-making in a DAO impact the legal shutdown process?
The outcome of CityDAO's situation could provide valuable insights for future DAOs considering similar legal structures.
The CityDAO case offers several crucial lessons for the broader DAO ecosystem:
1. Importance of Comprehensive Planning
As Novak emphasizes:
"You have to have some type of authority, some type of mandate from your participants. Like, are we going to do this other thing, or are we going to wind down? And if you don't have that system baked in from the onset of how you even make that decision, there's always going to be disagreements, right?"
DAOs need to incorporate robust lifecycle planning from the outset, including clear procedures for reassessment, evolution, and potential shutdown.
2. Balancing Member Rights and Organizational Stability
The rage quit dilemma highlights the need to carefully consider member rights and exit strategies. DAOs must find a balance between providing flexibility for members and ensuring the long-term viability of the organization.
3. Transparent Communication
CityDAO has maintained transparency with its community throughout its challenges, as evidenced by the public vote on returning funds. This transparency is crucial for maintaining trust and legitimacy in decentralized organizations.
4. Adapting Governance Models
The CityDAO experience suggests that DAOs may need to evolve their governance models to address changing circumstances and challenges.
5. Legal and Regulatory Preparedness
As DAOs venture into new legal territories, like DAO LLCs, they must be prepared to navigate complex regulatory landscapes, especially when managing physical assets and potential dissolutions.
While the potential shutdown of CityDAO may be seen as a setback for the DAO movement, it's important to view it as a valuable learning experience. As Miller reflects:
"I think, you know, obviously, that's why I do the work that I do with the DAO LLCs, which I think are often a better fit."
This sentiment underscores the importance of continued experimentation and refinement in DAO structures and governance models.
Novak adds an optimistic note:
"Generally speaking, especially in a circumstance like this, I've seen organizations try to make good ethical decisions, which they're certainly doing, right? Which is okay, if we don't have maybe the ability to continue building this organization, the right thing here is to return assets, distribute back to people, distribute pro rata."
This ethical approach to handling challenges is crucial for maintaining trust in the DAO ecosystem and ensuring its long-term viability.
As the DAO movement evolves, we'll likely see more sophisticated lifecycle management strategies emerge. These may include:
1. Modular DAO structures that can easily adapt to changing circumstances
2. More nuanced member rights and exit strategies that balance individual and collective interests
3. Improved mechanisms for managing and liquidating physical assets in a decentralized manner
4. Advanced legal frameworks that provide clarity on DAO operations and dissolutions
The CityDAO story serves as a crucial case study in the challenges and opportunities facing the DAO ecosystem. While the potential shutdown of such a high-profile project may seem discouraging, it's important to view it as part of the natural evolution of a new and revolutionary organizational paradigm.
As Miller points out:
"Now, with digital organizations having a lot of their assets on chain—at least much of the time—and this idea that so much of what's on chain is liquid, or at least is tradable, now it's an option that organizations can consider for the first time. So, it'll be interesting to see how that's used effectively, where it is used definitely."
This observation highlights the unique advantages that DAOs have in terms of asset management and member liquidity. However, as the CityDAO case demonstrates, these advantages also come with new challenges that must be carefully addressed.
The future of DAOs lies in learning from these early experiments, refining governance models, and developing more robust lifecycle management strategies. By doing so, the DAO ecosystem can evolve to create more resilient, adaptable, and effective decentralized organizations that can truly revolutionize how we collaborate and make decisions in the digital age.
As the crypto community watches the unfolding of CityDAO's story, it's clear that each challenge faced and overcome brings us one step closer to realizing the full potential of decentralized autonomous organizations. The road ahead may be bumpy, but it's paved with valuable lessons that will shape the future of decentralized governance.
