This guide was built to help you understand the benefits of incorporating your DAO and how the process of DAO incorporation works. We help you answer questions like:
Why should I incorporate my DAO? In what geographic jurisdiction should I incorporate my DAO? What legal entity type should I choose?
Get all the information you need to make the best decisions for you DAO by reading this guide.
By
MIDAO
In the rapidly evolving world of blockchain and cryptocurrency, Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) have emerged as a novel form of collective action and fundraising. However, as these new structures gain popularity, they also raise important questions about transparency, accountability, and ethical management of funds. The recent case of the Assange DAO provides a compelling example of the challenges and controversies surrounding fundraising in decentralized communities.
In this article, we'll explore the ethical considerations of DAO fundraising, drawing insights from a recent episode of the "Just DAO It" podcast. Hosted by Adam Miller, co-founder of MIDAO, with guest Arnold Almeida, founder of Lighthouse, the discussion sheds light on the complexities of managing large sums of money in a decentralized context.
The Assange DAO, created to support WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, successfully raised a substantial amount of cryptocurrency. As Adam Miller notes:
"Tens or hundreds of millions of dollars raised to this legal fund, and there's no transparency. No one knows who's in charge—no one."
This lack of transparency following a significant fundraising effort highlights a critical issue in the world of DAOs: How can we ensure that funds are being used appropriately when traditional oversight mechanisms are absent?
The recent news of Julian Assange's plea deal with the U.S. government has brought the Assange DAO back into the spotlight. However, as Miller points out, there's uncertainty about the DAO's role in this outcome:
"I think we actually have no clue if this 11,593 ETH had anything to do with freeing Assange. I sure hope so. I think I contributed to it—I contributed to some stuff like that—so I'm really curious to see what we find out in the coming weeks."
This situation underscores the difficulty in verifying the impact of decentralized fundraising efforts, especially when dealing with complex legal and political issues.
One of the key ethical considerations in DAO fundraising is the need for ongoing transparency. As Miller emphasizes:
"There's been very little—there's been no transparency as to where all this money went and how it's being spent."
This lack of transparency can erode trust in the DAO model and potentially discourage future participants from contributing to similar causes.
Arnold Almeida offers a more optimistic perspective, suggesting that there might be valid reasons for limited transparency during an ongoing legal battle:
"Maybe they couldn't report how they were fighting or doing certain things because that could have jeopardized the legal case."
This point raises an important ethical question: How can DAOs balance transparency with the potential need for strategic confidentiality in certain situations?
The Assange DAO case highlights the challenge of identifying leadership and responsibility in a decentralized organization. Miller raises a crucial question:
"Who was on the multisig? And even if it's a multisig of three people, should they ever have called that a DAO? Was that really a DAO, or were you just giving money to a foundation that was gonna—just because it's in crypto, it doesn't mean it's a DAO."
This observation underscores the need for clear definitions and standards in the DAO space. It raises ethical questions about how leadership and decision-making power should be distributed in truly decentralized organizations.
Almeida suggests that DAOs have an ethical obligation to report on their activities, especially after achieving their primary goal:
"Now that it's achieved its primary goal, this is really interesting because DAOs are not, you know, permanent structures. So, the question is: how do they wind down? How do they report on where the money was spent?"
This point highlights the need for DAOs to have transparent processes for reporting and potentially dissolving once their objectives have been met.
Miller expresses concern about the tendency to assume the best without verification:
"You're right; we should assume the best. I just—I don't know, should we really assume the best? I just feel like we get burned a lot by doing that."
This skepticism highlights the need for robust verification mechanisms in decentralized fundraising to protect contributors and maintain the integrity of the DAO model.
Almeida brings up an interesting example of how large fundraising efforts can promote transparency:
"Actually, that reminds me of something I read recently, maybe in the last week or so, and I think it was to do with the Indian COVID Relief Fund. A lot of money was donated to that fund to help India, and one of the things that was interesting is that to promote transparency, they employed one of the big three accounting firms—KPMG or someone else, EY—and they have a report that is published on a monthly basis to demonstrate where the money is being spent."
This third-party audit approach could serve as a model for DAOs looking to enhance their transparency and accountability.
Miller points out that the mere use of blockchain-based platforms doesn't guarantee the ethical management of funds:
"You can set up a Juicebox so that all the money gets sent to me, right? And so, just the fact that you're on Juicebox and saying you're raising money for Assange DAO, that is not enough information to know that you can trust where the money is going."
This observation highlights the need for more sophisticated technical infrastructure to enforce ethical practices in DAO fundraising.
The discussion suggests a need for DAO platforms to develop and implement ethical standards. These could include:
By incorporating these features, platforms could help ensure that DAOs adhere to ethical fundraising practices.
As the DAO ecosystem matures, learning from experiences like the Assange DAO is crucial. Almeida expresses hope for a positive outcome:
"Let's try and be optimistic in the sense that they will have some sort of transparency—they will use the funds to provide a breakdown and then wind it down in a way that gives crypto additional credibility."
This optimism suggests that even controversial cases can serve as learning experiences for the broader DAO community.
Moving forward, the DAO community needs to develop and adhere to best practices for ethical fundraising. These could include:
As DAOs become more prevalent, there's a growing need for education about the ethical considerations of participating in decentralized fundraising. Miller's comment highlights this need:
"You've really got to do your due diligence and know what you're getting into."
DAO platforms and community leaders should prioritize educating potential contributors about the risks and responsibilities of participating in decentralized fundraising efforts.
The case of the Assange DAO powerfully reminds us of the potential and pitfalls of decentralized fundraising. While DAOs offer exciting new possibilities for collective action and resource mobilization, they also present unique ethical challenges that the crypto community must address.
As Miller and Almeida's discussion illustrates, there's a pressing need for greater transparency, accountability, and ethical standards in DAO fundraising. By learning from past experiences, developing robust technical infrastructure, and promoting education within the community, we can work towards a future where DAOs can fulfill their revolutionary potential while maintaining the highest ethical standards.
The journey toward ethical DAO fundraising is ongoing, and it will require the collective effort of developers, community leaders, and contributors. As we continue exploring the possibilities of decentralized organizations, we must remain vigilant in upholding the principles of transparency, accountability, and ethical management essential to building trust and achieving lasting impact.
By addressing these ethical considerations head-on, we can help ensure that DAOs become a force for positive change, capable of mobilizing resources and coordinating action in previously unimaginable ways. The future of decentralized fundraising is bright, but it depends on our ability to navigate these ethical challenges and create systems that embody the values of openness, fairness, and collective responsibility at the heart of the DAO vision.
