This guide was built to help you understand the benefits of incorporating your DAO and how the process of DAO incorporation works. We help you answer questions like:
Why should I incorporate my DAO? In what geographic jurisdiction should I incorporate my DAO? What legal entity type should I choose?
Get all the information you need to make the best decisions for you DAO by reading this guide.
By
MIDAO
For billions of people worldwide, online platforms like Facebook have become the modern public square. Yet these digital spaces, despite their reach and influence, remain under centralized control. During a recent episode of the Just DAO It podcast, Jessica Smith, Head of Communications at Aragon and former Facebook public policy team member, shared unique insights about the limitations of centralized governance and the transformative potential of DAOs.
The story of online governance is one of increasing centralization and its consequences. Drawing from her experience at Facebook, Jessica describes a fundamental vulnerability: "When you have a platform that big, at that scale, managed by a centralized entity, there's a choke point. You can apply pressure at that point to get specific outcomes, and that makes the whole system vulnerable."
This vulnerability manifests in various ways:
The challenge extends beyond content moderation. During contentious political times, including the Cambridge Analytica scandal and the beginning of the pandemic, the structural limits of centralized platforms became increasingly apparent. Jessica's observations during these events led her to a profound realization: "Having all that infrastructure owned and maintained on centralized servers creates inherent vulnerabilities."
The podcast discussion revealed a compelling vision for the future of online governance. Jessica explains her journey to Web3: "When I came across Aragon specifically, I thought, 'Wow, DAOs and Aragon are the solutions to this.' You could slide a DAO under something like Facebook—a platform at the scale that democratizes access—and suddenly, the users would actually own the underlying infrastructure. They'd make decisions in a way that's sovereign, capture-resistant, and censorship-resistant."
However, implementing democratic governance at scale presents unique challenges. During the podcast, Jessica offered a nuanced perspective on the practicality of decentralized decision-making: "If you ask the entire user base of two or three billion people to decide what's right or wrong, or what should or shouldn't be said, you'd never reach a consensus because people's values and localized experiences are so vastly different across the world."
Instead, she suggests a more refined approach: "It's less about having billions of people vote on every single decision and more about giving people sovereignty and a meaningful voice in the decisions that affect them and their communities."
The podcast revealed how DAOs excel at creating focused governance for specific communities. "This technology shines in creating smaller pockets of governance," Jessica notes. "For example, platforms like Farcaster allow smaller communities to self-govern, set their own parameters and permissions, and make decisions that specifically apply to them."
Anthony, CEO of Aragon X, emphasizes the importance of robust infrastructure: "At Aragon, we focus on securing your protocol and governance. Whether it's your protocol, assets, or even information and data that needs to be secured on-chain, that's our priority."
Key components of democratic infrastructure include:
The podcast drew interesting parallels with traditional democratic practices. Adam Miller, the host, referenced de Tocqueville's observations about American democracy in the 1800s, noting how democracy was woven into every aspect of daily life—from student councils to community organizations.
This historical perspective suggests that regular practice strengthens democratic participation. As Anthony agrees, "At the end of the day, the question of whether a decision is better or worse is always going to be difficult to answer—it's often subjective, and outcomes can be a coin flip. But what's crucial is that if people have real power, they can stop coercion, corruption, or other abuses of authority."
The ability to resist external pressure emerges as a crucial benefit of decentralized governance. Anthony illustrates this with an example: "Take the example of a small group being pressured by a government to change an algorithm or suppress certain content. If the broader user base has hard power—real authority—over those decisions, it becomes much harder for such coercion to succeed."
One of the most significant challenges in digital democracy is maintaining engaged participation. The discussion highlighted how voter apathy and time constraints can limit involvement, particularly among key stakeholders.
Jessica emphasizes the importance of community understanding: "Given where the industry and technology are right now, we don't really have a choice but to make trade-offs if we want to keep building in a way that's effective, secure, and sustainable. I think we need to give ourselves and each other some grace for the steps we need to take, but we also need to be as transparent as possible."
The evolution toward decentralized governance represents more than just a technological shift—it's a fundamental reimagining of how online communities can govern themselves. Anthony observes, "We're not really interested in competing directly with others in the space because the pie could be endless. We could have the whole world governing on-chain, and that's where we should be focusing our efforts."
The transformation of online governance through DAOs offers a promising path toward more democratic, resilient digital communities. As platforms like Farcaster demonstrate, it's possible to build social spaces that incorporate governance at their core rather than treating it as an afterthought.
By providing communities with the tools for self-governance while maintaining security and transparency, DAOs are laying the groundwork for a more participatory internet. The challenge ahead lies not in whether to decentralize governance but in how to implement it effectively across different scales and contexts.
As Jessica concludes, the power of DAOs lies in "giving individuals and communities more agency and ownership. It's not necessarily about scaling that process to billions of people for every decision. Instead, the larger the scale, the narrower and higher the level of decisions should be. Conversely, smaller communities can make broader, more detailed decisions that align with their unique needs and values."
